Choose Klovis if your outreach is message-first across LinkedIn, email, WhatsApp, Instagram DM and Telegram with one unified inbox and a built-in CRM, and choose Close if your motion is dial-heavy and you want a native VoIP power dialer with SMS and email in one mature sales CRM.

Klovis vs Close comes down to which channel each platform leads with. Close is a sales-engagement CRM built around the phone, with native VoIP calling, a power dialer, two-way SMS, email sync and AI call summaries on top. Klovis is a multi-channel outreach CRM that messages prospects across LinkedIn, email, WhatsApp, Instagram DM and Telegram, then unifies every reply.
Both manage pipeline, but they optimize different motions. Close fits a call-and-text inside-sales team, while Klovis fits teams whose prospects answer in social and chat channels and who want outreach, inbox and CRM in one product.
| Capability | Klovis | Close |
|---|---|---|
| Channels | LinkedIn, email (Gmail / Outlook / IMAP), WhatsApp, Instagram DM, Telegram | Calling, SMS and email built in; LinkedIn and WhatsApp via integrations |
| Unified inbox | Every reply from all five channels in one attributed inbox | Unified call, SMS and email timeline per lead |
| Built-in CRM | Self-updating people, companies and deals tied to campaign replies | Full CRM with leads, opportunities, pipelines and reporting |
| Automation | Event-driven workflows that send outreach and book meetings | Multi-channel sequences plus rule-based automation on higher plans |
| Attribution | Replies attributed to contact and campaign, surviving pause and resume | Call, SMS and email activity logged to opportunities and forecasts |
| Pricing model | Per-seat plans for multi-channel outreach and CRM | Per-user plans tiered by automation and calling features |
Klovis sends natively on five channels, with the channel chosen per step inside a campaign: LinkedIn connection requests and messages, email through Gmail, Outlook or IMAP, and direct messages on WhatsApp, Instagram DM and Telegram.
Close leads with the phone instead. It has built-in calling, two-way SMS and email, which is a strong fit for dial-heavy teams, but it reaches LinkedIn and WhatsApp only through third-party integrations rather than as native outreach channels.
Map your channel mix before you choose: if most replies come from calls, Close fits; if they come from LinkedIn and chat apps, a tool that sends there natively covers more ground.
Klovis routes every reply from all five channels into one inbox, each conversation attributed to the prospect and the campaign that produced it, so LinkedIn, email, WhatsApp, Instagram and Telegram threads live side by side.
Close gives each lead a unified timeline of calls, SMS and emails, which is excellent for a dialer team. The difference is breadth: Close centers on call-and-text history, while Klovis centers on messaging across five channels.
Confirm the inbox spans the channels your prospects actually reply on, since a call-and-text timeline and a five-channel social inbox solve different problems.
Klovis includes a CRM of people and companies that updates itself as outreach and replies happen, and replies convert into deals that move through pipeline with no separate sync step.
Close is a mature, full-featured CRM with leads, opportunities, pipelines and reporting designed around call activity. Both keep outreach and CRM in one system; the question is whether your records should be fed by dialing or by multi-channel messaging.
Decide which records you want self-updating: dialer-driven opportunities in Close, or contacts and deals fed by native LinkedIn, email and chat outreach in Klovis.
Close offers multi-channel sequences that combine email, SMS, calls and tasks, with reply monitoring and templating; its rule-based automation for lead status, task assignment and follow-ups sits on its higher plans. Klovis adds event-driven workflows that fire on triggers like a record being created or updated, a tag added, a field change, a reply, or a no-response, and those workflows can send outreach and move a prospect toward a booked meeting.
Say a prospect accepts a LinkedIn connection and replies.
In Close, calls, SMS and emails log automatically into a per-lead timeline that feeds opportunities and forecasting. In Klovis, a reply can become a deal in the same workspace, attributed to the contact and the campaign that produced it, and that reply history is tracked per campaign and survives pause and resume, so attribution stays intact.
Close surfaces the conversation in the lead timeline so a rep books the meeting, often straight off a call. Klovis pulls meeting-booking into the automation layer, so a workflow can move a prospect toward a booked meeting automatically, all attributed to the same contact and deal.
Klovis is built for teams whose outreach is message-first across LinkedIn and chat apps: founders selling across channels, SDR teams coordinating replies, and revenue teams that want deals to update themselves from native messaging.
Close is built for phone-first inside-sales teams who live in a dialer and want calls, SMS and email unified in one CRM with strong reporting.
If your prospects answer on LinkedIn, WhatsApp and Telegram more than they pick up the phone, or you keep bolting on integrations just to message on social channels, that friction is the signal your motion has shifted from dialing to multi-channel messaging.
Close imports leads and opportunities and centralizes call, SMS and email history in one CRM. Klovis keeps records in one place too, because the CRM is part of the product, so migration means bringing your lists into the Klovis CRM and rebuilding your motion as multi-channel campaigns sent from your connected accounts.
Choose Klovis if
Choose Close if
Klovis and Close are both CRMs for outbound teams, but they lead with different channels. Close is the stronger choice for phone-first teams that live in a dialer and want calls, SMS and email unified in one mature CRM. Klovis is the stronger choice for teams running social and multi-channel messaging at scale, with a unified inbox, a self-updating CRM and event-driven workflows.
In short: pick Close if you dial, and pick Klovis if you message across LinkedIn, email, WhatsApp, Instagram DM and Telegram and want the whole outreach-to-pipeline journey in one place.
Close leads with the phone, with native calling, SMS and email in one sales CRM, while Klovis leads with messaging across LinkedIn, email, WhatsApp, Instagram DM and Telegram, then unifies every reply and turns it into pipeline.
Close focuses on calling, SMS and email natively and reaches LinkedIn or WhatsApp through third-party integrations. Klovis sends on those channels natively as part of a single campaign.
Yes. Klovis has a CRM of people, companies and deals that updates itself as outreach and replies happen, so there is no separate sync between outreach and your records.
For teams whose primary motion is dialing, Close is a strong fit thanks to its power dialer, two-way SMS and AI call summaries. Klovis is the better fit when most replies come from social and chat channels.
In Close a rep typically books the meeting from the lead timeline. In Klovis, event-driven workflows can move a prospect toward a booked meeting automatically, with the reply attributed to the contact and campaign.